![]() I personally use Harrison mixbus, because it's got a great built in channel strip and gets me where I want very fast. With Linux, you can get low CPU usage version is that have almost no bullshit in the background, freeing up more cpu for your daw. and daws like reaper, Ardor, and Harrison mixbus all starting to gain traction over pro tools, while being able to be ran on Linux. Linux is becoming increasingly more user-friendly, and stable. Has some of us can't afford, or just like to have PC, we don't want to use Mac, and we all fucking hate windows. There is a really big shift in the PC community, with gamers and even some audio guys. That, and as a guitar player for the cost of their DSP accelerator and a few plugins I can buy an AXE FX or Kemper rig, which would make all the UAD stuff redundant anyway. so I'm curious if at some point they overhaul that system for something that's better, and this is basically the reason I hold off. I've also read a few posts re: the load balancing design of the existing DSP and apparently as far as CPU's go, UAD's are quite inefficient. ![]() ![]() Their whole pull is that they offer this wide range of proprietary plugins but many use cases for those plugins present the need for one of their DSP accelerators on top of running the actual interface, even if you spring for something like an X8. Never used RME myself, but I was working on a large theatre production and it was the interface the musical director used which felt like a huge endorsement given the stakes live.ĭespite the sound and usability of the UAD stuff I'm still a little put off by their ecosystem. I've tracked through UAD and it sounds great. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |